Chipped Polish

Not Famous. Don’t Wanna Be.

Featured Post

Pay equality

Posted by Lizzie on Sep-5-2008

There’s a lot of talk about women’s issues this election cycle. Thanks to Hillary Clinton, and now Sarah Palin, we’re back in the spotlight. In that vein, Congress is pressing for a revote on the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, which failed to pass previously. McCain has come out again it:

“I am all in favor of pay equity for women, but this kind of legislation, as is typical of what’s being proposed by my friends on the other side of the aisle, opens us up to lawsuits for all kinds of problems,” the expected GOP presidential nominee told reporters. “This is government playing a much, much greater role in the business of a private enterprise system.”

I’ve recently engaged in a half-hearted IT job search - in anticipation of my eventual graduation from the Tech program. There seems to be a little available, but I’ve heard that women are not treated favorably in the IT industry. It would please me, and thousands of other women, tremendously if this actually became law. Would I know that my male counterparts were making more than me? Probably not. But this act would give me recourse should I find out about a pay discrepancy after the fact. As a woman hoping to work in a male-dominated field, I would feel just a little better knowing I had a safety net.

There was some talk that this law isn’t necessary. I beg to differ. I worked with a company (unrelated to the tech field) that cut me a mystery check. When I inquired to what the purpose of the check was, I was told that it was to make up for a pay difference between me and my male counterparts. I had no idea that the men were making that much more per hour than I was, but there was a lawsuit and the settlement agreement was that this company would pay the hourly difference to each female for whatever period of time they agreed to (I think it was 3 months, even though I’d been there for over a year at that point). I left that company not long afterward, but my eyes had been opened. The reasoning for the lower pay was that women are mothers and so are prone to miss work because of their sick children. Men, on the other hand, are more reliable and should be rewarded. Really?

At a time when a major political party has nominated a self-proclaimed “hockey mom” to be vice president, there should be no more “she should get less because she’s a mom”. This woman is seeking a job while parenting 5 children (and potentially helping parent a grandchild) so the reason listed above would apply to her and her pay should be cut significantly. Right? No. Wrong. Her husband will be able to tend to the children while she runs for office and he can tend to the children while she continues to govern Alaska (except that he’s got a full-time job plus an extra job on the side in the summer, but that’s not this issue). It’s only fair that the rest of American women enjoy the same equality in pay as the women who govern them.

Sphere: Related Content

Archive for November, 2007

Nov
22

I’m No Longer Doing PayPerPost

Posted by Lizzie

I was going to put something else here. But changed my mind. I don’t want that kind of traffic here anymore.

The post you’re probably looking for is at the blog that hasn’t been indexed by Izea and which won’t go toward my “RealRank”.

I’m going to take a breather for a couple of days.

Happy Thanksgiving.

Sphere: Related Content

Nov
21

Bambi Helped Make Me a Better Person

Posted by Lizzie

My youngest daughter, Maggie, is 3 and is currently working her way through my oldest daughter’s (16) Disney VHS collection. When Missy was little she received, I’m pretty sure, all of the Disney videos available at that time. We have quite the collection. Right now Maggie is watching “Bambi” and for some reason today that movie caused me to stop and reflect.

I have loved Disney forever. When I was a young child I loved “The Wonderful World of Disney” specials on t.v.  I’ve determined that these movies have actually made me a more compassionate person. I can’t eat venison because I always think “What if that’s Mother?” (referencing Bambi’s mother, of course). I imagine a poor little fawn lost and sad in the forest, calling out for his mama. I think like that about other animals too. Rabbits, to me, are always “Thumper”. I take special care with animals because I imagine them suffering like the characters in my favorite Disney movies- “Lady and The Tramp”, “101 Dalmations”, “The Fox and the Hound”, etc.

The older movies had a greater impact on me, I think, because they were more sad in places. When Bambi’s mother died, I cried. Shoot, I still get teary-eyed when I sit and watch it. The movie helped me see suffering and feel for other beings as a young child. And that benefits me as an adult. Both of my children seem to have a special affinity for animals now and they want to protect them. I think that watching those movies has instilled that sense of compassion and care into them, in the same way it did to me. Not to mention the fabulous memories we all share of our favorite movies. I remember watching “Bambi” as a child, so it’s easy to see that movie from my little one’s eyes. I like that.

Recently the VHS tapes have started to really disintegrate. They’ve gotten a lot of use over the years. The first to go was “The Little Mermaid“. I had to replace it with a DVD, of course. “Jungle Book” is getting worn out too now. So, I’m sending emails to relatives that I need Disney Movie replacements from Santa this year. Then when the tape starts to snap on each VHS I’ll be able to whip out the DVD and everything will be a-ok. No more tears because of lost viewing time. :)

P.S.

Just in time for Christmas, the Disney Movie Club is offering three movies for only $2! If you know someone who needs to replace some old VHS tapes for their munchkin, well….

Join Disney Movie Club and Get 3 of Your Favorite Disney Animated Classics for $1.99 each, and Free Shipping!

This is not a sponsored post.

Sphere: Related Content

Nov
20

Comparing Google to 9/11? HUH?

Posted by Lizzie

I read this today. A comparison between the Google Smackdown and the terrorist attacks of 9/11.

On 9/11 -

I watched the second plane fly into the World Trade Center live on television on 9/11. My sister had called to tell me the first plane crashed. It was about 10:30 at night here and The Other Half and I sat down and watched the live footage on cable. I was horrified to see that plane fly into the tower right in front of my eyes. I was stunned. So was the rest of the world.

A New Fear Was Born -

A few days later I had volunteered to paint houses for a charity organisation that housed women trying to leave abusive situations. About an hour into the painting I heard a plane approaching and I looked up - not with happiness, not with joy, but in *fear*. The terrorists had achieved what they wanted right there - they wanted to create fear.

Change Can Be Forever

The actions of the terrorists changed things forever - from airport security to the laws of several countries, to creating wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. I would suggest some of these changes were not seen in the crystal ball of the terrorists. I’d suggest that the anti-Google feeling and the amount of anger their actions would create was not seen in the crystal ball of Google, either. For some, there will be no going back to how things were.

My reply to that post was as follows:

Did you seriously equate the Google Smackdown with what happened Sept. 11 and the fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan? Do you honestly believe that Google removing pagerank is equal somehow to lost lives? Would you actually look a survivor of 9/11 or a surviving family member in the eye and compare losing pagerank to what happened to them? What about a war widow?

Wow.

Just wow.

Good on you for creating “controversy” and driving traffic, though. Shoot, if Giulani can campaign on the graves of the dead, why shouldn’t someone else compare their lost lives to lost pagerank?

You know, I would poke my own eyes out before I would support my own president in his ongoing “war”, but I have to say that I am deeply offended by your comparison.

Please remove the link to my site from your list. Thanks.

I am literally shaking with rage. I CANNOT even imagine that someone would actually print something like this up and then, for God’s sake, promote it for traffic.

I wrote this in the PPP forums where people seemed not to have read the post (I hope):

Am I the only one so deeply offended by that post that I am shaking with rage? Am I the only one that is disgusted by the comparison to a pagerank reduction to the terrorist attacks on the U.S. on 9/11?

Wow.

I left my comment regarding it on the post.

I’m seriously done with this business. When people can honestly compare an insignificant pagerank reduction to the DEATHS of thousands of human beings then the obsession with Google has gone too far. What happened on 9/11 changed the lives of millions of people irrevocably. The flippin’ Google Smackdown pales in comparison. I’m pretty sure the people that were personally effected by the terrorist attacks and the events following would agree with that assessment.

I have seen some really ugly things in the marketing sector of the blogosphere. Almost as ugly as the political sector. I’ve rolled my eyes and mentally marked people off my “must read” list because of stupid reasons for not commenting and considering themselves above other people because of their precious pagerank. But this takes the cake. This is beyond pale. There are comments on that post where readers are congratulating the author and agreeing with her assessment.

Am I too easily offended? Possibly. But I’ve lost a friend because of the events following 9/11, I’ve got friends in mourning now, and I see my country (and others) torn apart because of the real terrorists. How many lives has Google taken with their pagerank reduction? How many lives have been ruined? When will this precious flippin’ pagerank debacle take center stage in my nightly news? Why isn’t my Senator all over this atrocity?

Because when compared to other things it doesn’t matter. Yeah, PPP bloggers are losing money in advertising. How many died? Sure, some people are losing search engine traffic. Did Google somehow maim them physically? Are people actually going to be damaged forever and ever because they no longer have a pagerank?

I may be too harsh here, I admit that. I’m actually take my time between paragraphs. My anger is overwhelming me. I experienced that pagerank drop and guess what? I haven’t been devastated, my family is still intact, and I’m going to wake up tomorrow in the same condition that I am in today (God willing). Col. Keith Nepsa is still going to be dead because he was in Iraq fighting the real terrorists. And, no, those terrorists don’t work at the Googleplex.

I suppose I’ll calm down eventually. Still, I’m done with that kind of thinking. I feel dirty just from reading it. It doesn’t matter if you support the “war” or not, the fact is people actually die because of terrorists. Google’s not killing anyone and they didn’t cause 9/11. They aren’t even in the same class as Al Qaeda, to which they were compared. Are you kidding me?

Pitiful. Just pitiful.

Everyone has their line and that was mine. Gah!

(crossposted)

Sphere: Related Content